<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>
	
<channel>
	<title>BeOriginal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://beoriginal.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /> 
	<link>http://beoriginal.com/feed</link>
	<description>This is an example RSS feed</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<generator>http://beoriginal.com/feed</generator>
	<copyright>BeOriginal Copyright 2012, All Rights Reserved</copyright>
		<item>
			<title>DO YOU TAKE YOUR BRAND OR CONTENT SERIOUS? PROTECT IT</title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="fullsize" src="http://beoriginal.com/uploads/arm-branding-chest-blog-f4e7_800x223.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>In this "Post &amp; Repost World" of find it, link it, post it, I would like to take a minute and applaud those that acknowledge the creators of content. Quite often a post of a photo, illustration, video or even a cleaver quote goes uncredited. Most, if not all have been guilty of such at one time or another.</p>
<p>So why acknowledge the ones that post a credit line or that take the time to look up and email the photographer for permission before posting? Because those are the decent people that, if invited into your house will wipe their feet, take off there shoes and not steal the change laying on the coffee table. But really, it that true? Is that a fair correlation? No. Because those are things we learn over time. So that means it is up to the creators of content to engage in a teaching work.</p>
<p>Yes, it's an uphill battle, but if done right it can benefit not only those that create content but also those that spread it. Take for example&hellip; A bird that consumes seeds from 100 different trees and never spreads them, eventually the trees ceases to exists and the bird explodes. Well, not really but you get the point. Both birds and trees are benefited if done right. So how can it be done right?</p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: large;">5 Ways to Help Protect Your Brand</span></strong></p>
<p>1) Make sure the content (or logo) has the creators name is on or embedded into the content in a fairly conspicuous way. While at the same time offering to reduce or even remove it if the person agrees to a credit line or offers to pay a nominal fee.</p>
<p>2) Show a low resolution or small version so the person sees the value in your content, then offer a larger image. Again for either credit line, exchange or straight out cash.</p>
<p>3) Be kind not confrontational. Post on your site what your condition are for use of your content, whether it's images, videos, poems or books. For example, "Please feel free to use the first 2 stanzas of my poem as long as you credit My website, Me or my dog.</p>
<p>4) If you create a lot of content you may want to check out this site <a title="Creative Commons copyright for the digital age" href="http://creativecommons.org" target="_blank">CreativeCommons.org</a>. This is a nonprofit site dedicated to helping creative content providers, not only protect their work but also provide flexible copyright restrictions that are more suited to the digital age. As an example, we created a small digital sketchbook site <a title="Shaplead an Illustrators Showcase" href="http://sharplead.com" target="_blank">Sharplead.com</a>. There the artist has on each page this link <a title="Creative Commons right of use" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/" target="_blank">"Rights"</a> that lets people know how the images can be used. Out of the 50 or so images on the site, he has sold right to some of the images many times.</p>
<p>5) Make sure you tag your work with either key words, meta data or just unique names, not PIC002. Then follow up and look up your creation from time to time. By using a unique name it is easier to find in a search engine. You may also want to use a visual search engine like, <a title="Tineye &mdash; Look up images online" href="http://www.tineye.com" target="_blank">Tineye.com</a>.</p>
<p>These are just a few steps in a marathon of teaching people about original content, how it can and should be used legally in winning the hearts and minds of those that love to consume and spread digital content.</p>
<p>Protecting you brand and original content is a task that takes time and resources, but if done right can add to your bottom line.</p>
<p><em>Barry Brimer is founder and principal of BeOriginal, Atlanta, Georgia. Designing since 1976 and developing digital projects for clients since 1988. Here he is on <a title="Twitter address for Barry at BeOriginal" href="http://twitter.com/BeOriginal" target="_blank">Twitter</a></em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
			<link>http://beoriginal.com/blog/?post=28</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 20:04:21 -0500</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>barry</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/?post=28</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>[Concept] Netflix Website Homepage Redesign</title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>If you haven't been to the <a title="Netflix" href="http://www.netflix.com/" target="_blank">Netflix</a> homepage recently, then you're one of the few. I was at once one of  those few out there that hadn't yet joined the movement that is Netflix.  One of the things that kept me from signing up for the longest time was  the lack luster, mediocre at best homepage. This is the first page the  user experiences. Yet I couldn't help but think, "How could this site  that looks like it was developed back in the late 80's, be the thing to  bring us the future of movies?"</p>
<p>This  was the Netflix homepage as it was when I originally did the new  concept. I contacted anyone I could at Netflix and showed them the new  conceptual redesigned homepage (below). I'm not saying I had any kind of  influence, but it's an awful coincidence that the homepage has since  changed to a slightly nicer looking "design".</p>
<p>I went ahead and  took the dive into the unknown and became a member of Netflix despite my  reservations about how technologically sound and quality such a poor  design could be. Once I was in I was hooked and quickly moved from 1 to 3  movies out at a time, streamed any and all Doctor Who I could get, and  became a big fan of the service Netflix offers.</p>
<p><a class="popup" href="http://beoriginal.com/uploads/netflix-concept-site-001-ta-b93a_800x1100.png"><img class="thumb align_left" src="http://beoriginal.com/uploads/netflix-concept-site-001-ta-b93a_120x120.png" alt="" /></a>All that said, I  still felt like the design was done as more of a working, developer  design (nothing against developer, after all I'm one too), rather than a  real quality, usable, and astheticly pleasing design. I thought it  could be better, so here's what I put together for a new homepage  design.</p>
<p>With  this design I've incorporated everything in the current site, minus the  bland, ugly, dated design. Right away the user knows what this site  offers, movies. The color scheme works off of the Netflix red and  provides a much richer, touchable look. The new design keeps everything  the user needs to have quick access to on the homepage, and removes the  clutter and the harshness of the bright red used in the current  background.</p>
<p>In closing, we at BeOriginal think Netflix offers a  great service that keeps getting better. The current design really  doesn't show the quality, nor get the turnover that they deserve as a  great company providing a very current, high quality, and tech related  service. A new, updated, "web 2.0-ish" design could drastically improve  the new user growth, as well as the current user moral and organic  spread.</p>]]></description>
			<link>http://beoriginal.com/blog/?post=8</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 13:53:04 -0400</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>jonathan</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/?post=8</guid>
		</item>
</channel>
</rss>
